Dracula Reason vs. Rationality - 2158 Words

In Dracula written by Bram Stoker there is a constant battle between reason using superstition and rationality. Jonathan and Seward are both British men and subsequently express a more rational mindset. As the text continues and Dracula plays a larger role, the characters are forced to use a superstition to describe his role. By the end of the text, Jonathan and Seward use spiritual reasoning to defeat Dracula. Yet these characters use spiritual reasoning, scientific reason becomes the successor because throughout England, rationality is the more adopted method. Stoker uses these characters suggest that even though rationality is the greater successor, the spiritual ideas are still maintained. Rationality and superstition maintain†¦show more content†¦Van Helsing is from Denmark, which lies much further west, representing more spiritual ideas. Therefore, he is able to quickly root vampires as the cause of Lucy’s illness. On the other hand, Seward does not come to this conclusion and it becomes very difficult for him to comprehend Van Heilsin’s methods. Van Helsing buys garlic to hang throughout Lucy’s room. He explains how â€Å"I make pretty wreath and hang around your neck, so that you sleep well. Oh yes! They’re like the Lotus flower make your trouble forgotten. It smells like the waters of Lethe . and of that fountain of youth that the Conquistadores sought for in the Floridas†(120-121). Van Helsing does not follow along the English path of diagnosing her sickness and finding a cure that she could take. He completely follows the Eastern thought with mystical cures using garlic. He even draws the parallel to the fountain of youth or lotus flower, which are both completely irrational ideas. Dr. Seward does not follow Van Heising and is confused to see a fellow doctor abandon common methods practice and use garlic in a windowsill to cure Lucy. He said â€Å"well, Proffessor, I know you always have a reason for what you do, but this certainly puzzles me. It is well we have no skeptic here, or he would say you are working a spell on a evil spirit† (121). Seward does not understand the spiritual reasoning because he thinks it is ludicrous that a spirit could be vampire or other undead creature could be

American Military Might Free Essays

Present American military and law enforcement agency might has been put to a test both internally and externally in recent years. With the creation of the Department of Homeland Security, which was born, in large part, in response to the events of September 11, resources for battling terrorism have increased. Nevertheless, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq have shown that the United States is not adequately equipped militarily to confront and defeat sophisticated terrorist operations. We will write a custom essay sample on American Military Might or any similar topic only for you Order Now While there has been a decrease in  terrorist acts occurring in the United States, acts of terrorism abroad have not decreased. Clearly, the adequacy of military planning and military preparedness has been called into question. Douglas Bodero (1999) has identified four major theological extremist areas. These four groups are apocalyptic cults, Black Hebrew Israelism, the Christian Identity movements, and white supremacy religions. Doomsday cults believe that they must take offensive action in order to bring about the end of the world (White:2002). These beliefs form the basis and justification for the use of violent methods which are often directed at the United States. â€Å"†¦ (T)errorist weapons are increasingly sophisticated and deadly. † (White: 2002). Osama bin Laden excluded, intelligence agencies in the United States have been highly successful in locating and identifying terrorist group leaders. Unfortunately, the failure to obtain intelligence from Middle East sources before terrorist acts occur has often been a challenge for the United States military and law enforcement agencies. This -1- is demonstrated by the failure to win battles in the Vietnam, Korean, and Iraq Wars. While the United States certainly has a tremendous military advantage with highly technological weapons, including nuclear weapons and satellite surveillance, access to nuclear weapons has no advantage unless the United States is willing to use such weaponry. Treaties with the United Nations have outlawed the use of nuclear weapons by any country. By doing, the United States has no ability to use such military might. In the countries previously described, ground war tactics and guerrilla warfare have proved a match with American troops (White:2002). The unpopularity of the military draft, which originated in the Vietnam era, has prevented the United States from building sufficient troops needed in fighting terrorism and state-sponsored terrorism. Clearly, the United States simply has insufficient troops to battle terrorism occurring abroad. An increasing trend comes in the form of state-sponsored terrorism. Libya, Syria, and Iran are but some of the many countries which finance and provide weaponry and safe havens to terrorist groups. In the past, terrorist training camps located in Afghanistan have assisted in training aspiring terrorists from all over the world, including the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) (White:2002). In order to make a dent in preventing terrorism, the United States must recognize that a policy which publicly states that â€Å"We will not negotiate with terrorists† is often an impossibility. Certainly, the British initially believed that rogue colonies in the American Revolution were terrorists and Britain used that policy to no avail. The policy which is advanced herein ignores basic crisis negotiation tactics. Just as police must negotiate with -2- kidnappers and hostages to prevent harm to citizens, it is asserted here that the major conflicts could be mitigated and prevented (to some extent), with a different ideology in dealing with the â€Å"terrorists† and terrorist groups involved in the Iraq Civil war. CITATION White, J. (2002). Terrorism: An Introduction (4th Ed. ). Belmont:CA Wadsworth. -3- How to cite American Military Might, Papers

Obamas Speech in India

President Obama of the United States of America gave a long speech in India, November 2010. His visit in India was on his way to Asia, whereby he intended to visit Japan, china, south Korea and Singapore. The four countries he visited own more than 46% of the United States foreign-held debt. The speech that he gave consisted of so many things, but most importantly, he stretched on the relations between the United States and India.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Obama’s Speech in India specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More As much as India has changed in various things, Obama added that the relationship of the two nations has also changed (Jaffe 12). The partnership of India and United States was considered as natural and necessary during this meeting. One of the major benefits of ensuring a good relation between the two nations was to bring them closer to each other, hence increasing trade and the success of s ome important agreements. Obama insisted that, it is his vision, and that of his nation for India and the United States to partner for their mutual benefit, and that of the whole world. Every country has a desire to satisfy its interests. The United States president said he was convinced and sure that, relating with India would make the interests of the two nations best advanced. Some of the interests of the United States as stated by Obama were security, prosperity, growing economy, and respect for universal values (Duke 10). The promoted relation between India and the United States would make these interests achievable. Stronger global relationship would assist most of the nations to realize their dreams of prosperity. The United States president confirmed to the Indians that the relationship between the two countries is unique. Some of the unique features that can strengthen their relationship, and reap some benefits are their strong democracies. The constitutions of the two nati ons begin with the same revolutionary words according to Obama. The relation of the two nations was going to be very positive and very beneficial to the whole world. Much of the benefits were to be realized from the fact that, the two nations are free market economies, whereby their citizens are free to pursue their interests, and come up with new ideas that can bring change to world. The partnership of India and the United States is considered to be an indispensable one, and would meet the major challenges that are faced by nations especially the developing ones. Enhancing the relationship of the two nations has been a priority of the United States president. He started working on the success of this relationship during the first official state visit, in the white house, when he invited India Prime Minister Singh.Advertising Looking for essay on international relations? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Through this visit, the two governments started working together, especially in finding solutions of the major challenges that the two nations encounter (Wagner 32). The president confirmed that, the United States will not only welcome India into this healthy relationship, but it would also support it, to make the visions of the two nations a reality. The issue of securing the world from dangerous and vulnerable nuclear material was another stated benefit to be reaped from this relationship. This is meant to result to these two nations strengthening the backgrounds of democratic governance, globally. The president appreciated the efforts of Indian government to make use of technology to make issues more open and transparent to the citizens (29). He recommended that, as a good way of empowering citizens, by making the services that they require available to their reach, and making officials responsible of their acts. Obama emphasized that the new collaboration of the two governments would major in sharing e xperiences, identify the key areas, and come up with the most efficient tools to empower their citizens. Works Cited Duke, Gerald. Obamas ten day journey to Asia. 22 November 2010. 24 September 2011 https://www.thenigerianvoice.com/. Jaffe, Mathew. President Obama in India. 3 November 2010. 24 September 2011 https://www.huffpost.com/. Wagner, George. President Obamas Asia Visit. 2 November 2010. 24 September 2011 https://www.csis.org/. This essay on Obama’s Speech in India was written and submitted by user Jesse Delaney to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

Belarus essays

Belarus essays On August 25, 1991 the Republic of Belarus gained its independence from the Soviet Union.The Republic of Belarus had recognized the city of Minsk as its capital. Landlocked in Eastern Europe, Belarus has a total area of 207,600 sq km, including no appreciable water areas. Belarus has 3,098 km of borderline adjacent to 5 different countries. Belarus is mainly comprised generally of flat land with a good deal of marshland. This land can be dived into 5 land uses: arable land 29%, permanent crops 1%, permanent pastures 15%, forests and woodland 34%, other 21% (1993 est.). Belarus generally has cool and moist summers with cold and sometimes harsh winters. Belarus main natural resources consist of peat deposits, forests, and small quantities of natural gas and oil. Since Minsks liberation in 1944 its population has steadily increased from 50,000 to 1,672,000 people as (1995 est.), qualifying it as the largest city in Belarus. Excluding Minsk, Belarus top 5 cities by population in order are: Homjel', Mahiljow, Vicebsk, Hrodna, and Brst (2001 est.). 99.9 % of all electricity in Belarus is produced by fossil fuels while 0.01 % is hydroelectric. Per year, Belarus produces 24.911 billion kWh while the consumption of kWh is at 27.647 billion kWh, forcing Belarus to import 7.1 billion kWh, although Belarus does export 2.62 billion kWh. The only environmental issues plaguing Belarus are soil pollution from excessive pesticide use and nuclear fallout in the south from the 1986 Chernobyl accident. Belarus has a population of 10,350,194, growing at a rate of -.15% per year. Belarus has a population density of 50.10 people/sq km, currently ranked 147th in the world. Belarus has a mortality rate of 13.97 deaths/1,000 population and a infant mortality rate of 14.38 deaths/1,000 live births. Belarus ratios are: under 15 years: 1.04 male(s)/female ...

How Are the Experts Using LinkedIn - Guest Post by Helen Denney-Stone

How Are the Experts Using LinkedIn - Guest Post by Helen Denney-Stone I was honored to discover an article on LinkedIn Publisher that gave me extensive mention and props for my presentation at the LinkedIn Success Summit. I requested that the author, Helen Denney, allow me to publish a revised version of the article on my blog, and she graciously agreed! Enjoy the updated article below! ⊕⊕⊕⊕⊕ When Liam Austin chose the speakers for his LinkedIn Success Summit, he invited Brenda Bernstein and 34 other top speakers to share their winning strategies and tips on how to use the LinkedIn platform. Together, these invited experts condensed decades of experience and success into a wealth of video sessions. If you haven’t yet been able to generate a positive Return on Investment (ROI) using the LinkedIn platform, you most definitely will after hearing these stories and strategies. The following are my takeaways from 3 of the experts, all who have one major thread in common: they are all women experts on LinkedIn! They give advice on how to stand out on LinkedIn, and even how to build a basic LinkedIn profile, in case you’re just starting out! Brenda Bernstein #1 Amazon best-selling author of How to Write a Killer LinkedIn Profile. Brenda is a highly qualified and award winning writer. Founder of the Essay Expert, LinkedIn expert and Speaker. Brenda believes that you can profit from your personality when writing your LinkedIn profile. The key points below are her strategies on how to do this in an authentic and memorable way. Don’t be afraid to share your values, vision, beliefs and personality prominently in your profile. Do this effectively and you will stand out from your competitors. Get a branded head shot that has some oomph! Try choosing 3 words that describe your personality, and share them with your photographer. Then choose your head shot based on which one best captures those 3 words. Don’t lose sight of keywords as you share your personality! Prioritize keywords in your headline if you want to be found in searches. Write your Summary to show your personality and the personality of your business. Figure out what makes you and/or your business stand out- and if you want to be personable, write in the 1st person (I/me).Brenda suggests that to get material for your LinkedIn Profile, you can write down 3 peak moments in your life/business. Next pull out any common threads. You will learn a lot about what you have to offer and what makes you tick. You can also ask people you know what they see as your strengths. Write down what they say and weave it into your profile. If they like it then others probably will too! Finally, determine what you want people to take away from reading your profile. What action do you want them to take next? Read your profile Summary now that you’ve included more of yourself in it. If you were a member of your target audience, would you take the action you want your readers to take? Publish on LinkedIn and show your personality and credibility in your articles. Make sure to respond when people comment on your posts. Be active in LinkedIn Groups and don’t be afraid to show your humour, intelligence and personality. When someone sends you a friend invitation, respond and give them something free first- something you feel will be of value to them. Brendas Quotes: â€Å"Almost no one likes writing about themselves. But almost everyone likes seeing themselves expressed authentically on paper.† â€Å"Top mistake on LinkedIn: Thinking all you need is a KILLER LinkedIn profile.† ⊕⊕⊕⊕⊕ Donna Serdula Donna, the Founder of Vision Board Media, is a LinkedIn Profile Optimisation Expert speaker and author. Donna explained your profile is NOT your resume. Your resume is your professional past; it is what you have already done. Your LinkedIn profile is your online reputation- who you are and why connections should pay attention to you. It is your digital representation of your future. Make your profile compelling, exciting and authentic. It is, after all, people’s first impression of you. It should make people want to know more. Donna’s 3 Keys to Maximising your LinkedIn Profile: Before you start on your profile, answer this question: What is the goal of my LinkedIn profile? Only after you know your goal can you can write strategically, keeping that goal in the forefront of your mind. Always talk about what your target audience wants to hear. Speak to them directly, as if they are across the table from you! Headline Think what people would be typing into the search bar on LinkedIn to find you. Optimise your profile for these keywords so you show up in search results. How can you stand out when someone is scrolling through the search results? The first part they will see is your name, your profile picture, and your headline (which by default is your current job title and your company). So make sure your profile image is professionally done, and that your headline is optimised with keywords, is compelling and showcases a benefit statement. Summary Your Summary, which is 2000 characters maximum, should demonstrate who you are, that you understand your readers’ problems, and that you can help them.Your summary should be in 1st person narrative and written conversationally. Highlight some successes, demonstrating how you can help your audience.Be succinct and answer what your customers/clients want to know. If possible, include a link and offer for them to take the next step. Include a clear call to action at the end, as well as your phone number and email so people can contact you easily. Keywords Research your keywords. Then make sure that these keywords are in your heading, summary, experiences and interests. Place the keywords anywhere that is reasonable. Your profile must read naturally and authentically. Never, never stuff your profile with keywords; but take the time to place them everywhere that is plausible. Donna’s Quotes: â€Å"Recognize your target audience and don’t say what you want to say, rather think what your target audience wants to hear.† â€Å"Step back, think about your goal, think about your audience.† ⊕⊕⊕⊕⊕ Karen Yankovich Founder of Linked Up Success, Karen is a LinkedIn expert and speaker. When someone puts your name in a Google search and sees your LinkedIn profile right at the top, this is statistically what they will look at first. This is a brilliant opportunity through your profile to instantly communicate who you are, your personal brand. Use your profile to get them to feel comfortable doing business with you. Karen shares her 5 tips that you need to pay attention to when completing your profile. Be certain to complete these 5 areas and use them effectively. Headline Your headline should be strong and customer/client centric. In other words, just stating that you are CEO is not enough! Your headline is searchable by Google and shows up prominently in Google Search. Be bold, own what you do, and be confident when painting that picture for others to see! Summary Firstly, actually fill this out! Break your summary into easily consumable sections with bullet points. Write it in the 1st person, use all 2000 characters you are allowed, and include keywords. Experience This section builds on who you are and what you have accomplished to be where you are today. Think about all your past experience, not just your previous jobs. Position yourself as influential and the expert you are. Call to Action Remember to put in a call to action not in a salesy way, but something like, â€Å"Reach out if you want a complimentary training†; â€Å"Listen to my podcast†; or â€Å"Download my free report† Make your profile stand out by taking advantage of all the ways LinkedIn provides to customize your profile. Boost your business with 3 further strategies from Karen: Build up your recommendation and be active; actually ask for recommendations. Show up! Be active in groups, post regularly, share, and comment on influencers. Sort your connections by recency, then send a personal note to the most recent. When they respond, take the opportunity to offer help. Karen’s Quotes: â€Å"Start with a strong personal brand to grow your business on LinkedIn.† â€Å"#1 Mistake on LinkedIn: Don’t be pushy, be mindful.† ⊕⊕⊕⊕⊕ Did you pick up the major common thread? It’s your profile! Your LinkedIn Profile is like a 5-minute fast dating session where you get to say who you are, what you do and how you can help. It is your audience’s first impression- make it great, make it authentic, and make it you! The LinkedIn Success Summit was full of many wonderful interviews and the above is a summary of just 3 of the 35 presenters. You’ll find even more great tips by clicking here. Would you like to read more from Helen about LinkedIn experts and influencers (and save yourself the time of listening to all the presentations at the Summit)? Then please click here to read Part 1 of Helen’s Summit Summaries! Helen Denney-Stone is CEO and co-founder of Nudge Marketing, a firm that provides affordable, results-based marketing training for small businesses. She is a published author and artist and loves all things, mindful and marketing†¦ oh! and high heels, boxer dogs and the smell of freshly cut grass. Read the original version of this article here.

Grammar teaching analysis in rural China Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Grammar teaching analysis in rural China - Essay Example n 2002), and China following a history of more traditional teaching based on the grammar-translation method (GTM) started reforms within their middle and high schools and universities in the early 1990s by introducing CLT. The question is whether or not the introduction of CLT into the Chinese education system by the government has been successful in terms of teachers actually using such an approach for the teaching of grammar and whether they have the knowledge and ability to do so appropriately. Prior to the 1970s, the goals of teaching English was to impart correct, error free language; emphasis was placed more on form than on use, thus the Grammar Translation Method was very popular. As the name implies, focus was on the rules and structures of the language, used to translate from the mother tongue to the target language, and the oral/aural skills of listening and speaking were ignored in favour of reading and writing. Except for the period of the Cultural Revolution Chinese governments have been committed to the teaching of foreign languages and although Russian was popular for a while, English has been regarded by the new communist regime as significant to modernization (Ji Fengyuan 2004). The teaching of English has always been teacher, textbook and exam focused and so the GTM has been the ruling approach to the teaching of English, with students taking a passive role in the learning process. In traditional classrooms therefore, language learning is reduced to mastery of the grammar and lexicon, and students attain more knowledge of the language in terms of perfect grammatical structures reproduced in grammatical exercises and exams, than their ability to use it in real life. Led by British linguists such as Halliday and Firth and in reaction to GTM, CLT was advocated as the new method in language teaching, addressing the need to acquire communicative competence with natural exposure not teaching, to all four skill areas of reading, writing, listening

Criminal Law Problem question Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Criminal Law Problem question - Essay Example The relevant facts in the Kennedy case are substantially similar to the facts in the given problem. In Kennedy, as in the case of Edward, the defendant merely prepared a dose of heroin for the deceased. It was the deceased who self-administered the drug as in Lisa's case. In the Kennedy case, the court ruled that defendant Kennedy cannot be held criminally liable for manslaughter. Applying the Kennedy ruling, then Edward cannot likewise be held criminally liable for Lisa's death because Edward was not the one who injected the deceased with the drug. Under the same principle, Sarah cannot likewise be held criminally liable for Lisa's death as she was not the one who injected Lisa with the drug. Notably, Edward (unlike in Kennedy) was not also the one who gave the syringe to the deceased. If Kennedy (who was the one who gave the syringe to the deceased) is not criminally liable, then a fortiori Edward should not also be held criminally liable for Lisa's death since he was not even the one who gave the syringe to the deceased. In ruling for the defendant, the Kennedy court had occasion to discuss the elements of the crime of unlawful act manslaughter: (1) that the defendant committed an unlawful act; (2) that such unlawful act was a crime and (3) that the defendant's unlawful act was a significant cause of the death of the deceased. In the given problem, Edward admittedly committed an unlawful (and criminal) act by supplying the heroin to the deceased. The mere act of supplying heroin, however, could not have possibly caused Lisa's death since "the supply of drugs would itself have caused no harm unless the deceased had subsequently used the drugs in a form and quantity which was dangerous."2 Clearly, any unlawful act manslaughter charge cannot be based on the mere act of supplying the heroin. According to the Kennedy court, the heroin (as in the given problem) is described as "freely and voluntaril